‘Human Energy Efficiency’ Is a $4 Billion Cost Saving Just Waiting for Businesses to Tap

By admin | August 28, 2008

Submitted by EnergyTechStocks.com

Meet Todd Rossi, president of Field Diagnostic Services Inc. (FDIS), a small Philadelphia-based technology services company that’s working in a multi-billion-dollar industry nobody has heard of – yet.

EnergyTechStocks.com is going to call this industry “Human Energy Efficiency.” The concept behind it is simple. With the standard energy management systems businesses use today, each time a building’s air conditioning or heating unit experiences a problem, a service technician goes out and fixes it. Since a big box retailer might have as many as 25 separate heating and cooling units per building, the number of service tech visits can really mount up.

diagnostics330.jpg

But with technology from a company like FDIS, one visit can result in maintenance and repair work being performed on several units at the same time. FDIS’s computer-controlled technology remotely monitors all of a building’s units, and provides a service tech with a handheld monitor that allows him to see which units have what problems. Rossi says that with FDIS technology, 20% can be saved on the combined maintenance, replacement and energy costs of some nine million pieces of so-called commercial unitary equipment in use by thousands of U.S. businesses big and small. That’s a saving of approximately $4 billion a year, Rossi told EnergyTechStocks.com, with the biggest potential savings accruing to large retailing establishments.

It probably won’t be long before human energy efficiency gains prominence. Bank of America recently made a strategic investment in FDIS. In announcing the transaction, Bank of America said FDIS’ new energy-saving technology can “truly” impact the environment as well as a company’s bottom line.

Rossi said his firm also trains service technicians in the new technology. He said his company’s goal is simply to reduce the amount of money a company is paying for electricity.

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

Comments